Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 02:51:23PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>> > On 07/23/2013 02:39 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> >> This allows excluding the sync-fate-samples target from conditions
>that
>> >> match all other fate-related targets.
>> >> ---
>> >>
>> >> Now with a name that is really better than its predecessor.
>> >>
>> >
>> > No, it is longer, easier to mistype.
>
>The new name expresses what is done in a clearer fashion.  It's not
>clear
>that "fate-rsync" updates the samples and not the tests themselves.
>
>> > Just filter out fate-rsync please.
>> 
>> I agree, the new name is worse, and it reeks of an ugly rename just
>to
>> avoid a semi-ugly part somewhere else.
>
>There is no rename, I add an alternative name and deprecate the
>original.

Still not compelling...

lu


_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to