On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:50:05AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote: >> This allows excluding the samples-rsync target from conditions that >> atch all other fate-related targets. >> --- >> >> This now deprecates the target instead of dropping it. The second patch >> remains simple and fate-rsync stays in place for those intent on not >> changing their scripts. >> >> Better names than "samples-rsync" welcome. "(r)sync-samples" maybe? >> >> doc/fate.texi | 4 ++-- >> doc/git-howto.texi | 2 +- >> tests/Makefile | 9 ++++++--- >> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > So, can everybody live with this solution? >
I still think fate-rsync sounds better as a name, and the rename is really not all that useful. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
