On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, Luca Barbato wrote:
Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 02:51:23PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 07/23/2013 02:39 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
This allows excluding the sync-fate-samples target from conditions
that
match all other fate-related targets.
---
Now with a name that is really better than its predecessor.
No, it is longer, easier to mistype.
The new name expresses what is done in a clearer fashion. It's not
clear
that "fate-rsync" updates the samples and not the tests themselves.
Just filter out fate-rsync please.
I agree, the new name is worse, and it reeks of an ugly rename just
to
avoid a semi-ugly part somewhere else.
There is no rename, I add an alternative name and deprecate the
original.
Still not compelling...
Sorry to say it, but I also still prefer the old name.
// Martin
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
