On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 01:54:25PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:50:05AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote: > >> This allows excluding the samples-rsync target from conditions that > >> atch all other fate-related targets. > >> --- > >> > >> This now deprecates the target instead of dropping it. The second patch > >> remains simple and fate-rsync stays in place for those intent on not > >> changing their scripts. > >> > >> Better names than "samples-rsync" welcome. "(r)sync-samples" maybe? > >> > >> doc/fate.texi | 4 ++-- > >> doc/git-howto.texi | 2 +- > >> tests/Makefile | 9 ++++++--- > >> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > So, can everybody live with this solution? > > I still think fate-rsync sounds better as a name, and the rename is > really not all that useful.
Except that it fixes the small problem this patchset tackles... Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
