On 07/23/2013 01:54 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:50:05AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote: >>> This allows excluding the samples-rsync target from conditions that >>> atch all other fate-related targets. >>> --- >>> >>> This now deprecates the target instead of dropping it. The second patch >>> remains simple and fate-rsync stays in place for those intent on not >>> changing their scripts. >>> >>> Better names than "samples-rsync" welcome. "(r)sync-samples" maybe? >>> >>> doc/fate.texi | 4 ++-- >>> doc/git-howto.texi | 2 +- >>> tests/Makefile | 9 ++++++--- >>> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> So, can everybody live with this solution? >> > > I still think fate-rsync sounds better as a name, and the rename is > really not all that useful.
+1 _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
