Hi Eric, Did you run ant/build.sh at the top-level to generate the html files as well?
Cheers, Jerry On Dec 1, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Eric Woods wrote: > Gav, I updated the committer list with my information. I committed the > change... hoping to see the site updated shortly. > > Thanks, > Eric W. > > > On Nov 28, 2010, at 6:34 PM, Gav... wrote: > >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: ant elder [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Sunday, 28 November 2010 7:31 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [libcloud] [VOTE] - Libcloud to become a TLP. >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Gav... <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> This is a chance for the libcloud community and committers to >>>> vote on whether or not you think we are ready to become an >>>> ASF top level project. In other words, the community thinks >>>> it has learned all it can from the Incubator, and that we feel >>>> we are following the guidelines learned along the way. >>>> >>>> Please vote now, we have plenty of time until the next board >>>> meeting is due in which a resolution would be required, so we'll >>>> leave this open for 1 week to gather as many votes as possible. >>>> >>>> [ ] - +1 - yes please, we are ready to become a TLP. >>>> >>>> [ ] - -/+0 - Not that opinionated either way. >>>> >>>> [ ] - -1 - no , I don't think we are ready , because ... >>>> >>>> Note any -1 must be accompanied by a detailed explanation. >>>> >>>> This vote will close one week from today. >>>> >>>> Gav... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I'm -1 for the reasons described at: >>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator- >>> libcloud/201011.mbox/%3CAANLkTim8ViOH3-D9TVbpUbgySTjWXns- >>> [email protected]%3e >> >> Well, let's bring those reasons here: >> >> Quote: "... >> >> [1]I'm not sure I'm convinced there's nothing more to be learnt here. >> Dealing with what to do with the Java impl would help at least >> demonstrate the community can deal with an awkward situation, just >> leaving it in the sandbox seems like a holding pattern to me. >> >> [2] But even if thats not done i don't get the warm fuzzy feeling that the >> libcloud >> community has learnt the Apache Way yet. It would be nice to see not >> just the same one person doing all the releases, all the committer >> nominations, most of the commits etc, even with graduation there >> hasn't been any real discussion that i've seen about what the >> graduation requirements are and why they've been met. >> >> [3]If for some reason you were unable to continue here Paul i'm not seeing >> much >> evidence that the others would know all the ropes to continue. What do >> mentors/others think about this? >> >> ..." >> >> I've split them into 1,2,3 and address them here: >> >> [1] - Paul has already explained this to my satisfaction. A sandbox area is >> fine for >> the java impl. The project need not have took it at all but they did. Mainly >> one person >> works on this area currently and is happy with its progress. The whole of a >> projects >> code need not be in a state of release for it to graduate from the >> incubator. Accepting >> the code and granting committer status and an area for this to be developed >> shows >> that the community dealt with the situation just fine. >> >> [2] - One person doing the releases is fine for now. I know plenty of other >> podlings that >> graduated with only one RM - in some cases with only one release. I know >> plenty of >> Top Level Projects that have had the same RM for years. I am involved with >> one such project. >> Over time, other committers will learn to see and nominate prospective >> committers, again not >> a big deal IMHO and not something that other podlings have been delayed for. >> Commit diversity: http://www.ohloh.net/p/libcloud/contributors?page=1 shows >> 16 committers - yes >> Paul has done more than anyone else, but 316 out of 694 is less than half >> total commits. Again >> I can show you many many projects where one committer has more than double >> the next person, and >> especially when the project first starts out, that is just the way it is, >> nothing to worry >> about IMHO. >> I am going to agree with you with regard to graduation requirements to a >> point. It is up to the >> Mentors I feel to point out and help address these requirements if they are >> not being met. We >> have been mostly hands off Mentors - which is fine, but it does show that >> the project in the >> main has been moving along by itself. >> >> As both you and I have mentioned before, the only thing I can see that I >> would like addressed >> is the question of diversity - would someone who is not a mentor please edit >> the document >> at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/libcloud.html and put down your >> employer if your >> employer is paying you to work on this project, otherwise simply write >> 'independent' beside >> your name. I will hold back my vote until this is done. >> >> [3] - I don't want to speculate or penalise a project for something that >> might or might not >> happen in the future and especially not knowing the state of the project or >> the knowledge >> of the other committers at that time should it happen. It would be wrong to >> hold a -1 to >> graduation based on this. >> >> -- >> >> So summary then Ant to your questions, I think overall I am satisfied with >> the project and its >> committers readiness to graduate. In places I think you are perhaps being a >> little too strict >> though I completely understand your reasonings. I guess I have a more >> liberal view of the >> incubator as a whole, and comparing libcloud with other projects that I know >> to have graduated >> or failed, I feel they are generally in good stead, if a little lazy on the >> paperwork. >> >> If I see that the http://incubator.apache.org/projects/libcloud.html page >> gets updated correctly >> as I have asked before the deadline, then my +1 will be forthcoming. >> >> >> Gav... >> >> >>> >>> ...ant >> >> >
