Eleanor Saitta: > On 2012.08.06 18.06, Jacob Appelbaum wrote: >> Eleanor Saitta: >>> On 2012.08.06 17.54, xmux wrote: >>>> On 08/06/2012 08:50 PM, Nadim Kobeissi wrote: >>>>> Suggestions welcome!! >>>> >>>> Don't provide the insecure version at all? How many people use the >>>> Chrome plugin vs. the website version currently? >>> >>> The "insecure" version is currently the only thing which is interesting >>> about cryptocat. (And, to be clear, the secure version does not yet >>> exist; when it does, it will be marginally interesting at best when >>> compared with the less secure version which fills a much needed position >>> within an ecosystem of tools.) >> >> Huh? The "more secure" version is the current chrome plugin. > > Sorry, I didn't realize that there was already a shipping chrome plugin > version -- I'd assumed that threat modeling and the like were happening > before development on the next version started. >
Right - that is why there is so much heated discussions - there is a TON of stuff done before full discussions have happened in public. This is something I've been pushing Nadim to do in public because his views are worth considering but lots of other reasonable people are left out. All the best, Jake _______________________________________________ liberationtech mailing list [email protected] Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click above) next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily digest?" You will need the user name and password you receive from the list moderator in monthly reminders. You may ask for a reminder here: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator. Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech
