Anna, look again please at the example.  

It was not a comparison of one person's efforts vs another's

It was a comparison of SUBJECTIVE valuation by one person of 
an hour of their labor vs the SUBJECTIVE valuation by another 
person of their $10.  If you value your $10 as being worth LESS 
TO YOU than an hour of my labor AND I value my labor as being 
worth LESS to me than your $10, THEN we have the makings of 
a MUTUALLY beneficial 'exploitation'  We each voluntarily enter 
into an exchange of my labor for your $10.  

In this process, We both got 'wealthier' each in our own terms  :)  


-Terry Liberty Parker 
PleaseSee: Your Freedom and the Rights of Others 
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/22990  



--- In [email protected], "Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I see a problem here. I have never met a person who would feel that 
his efforts would be worth less than mine. 
> So, who decides about fair values?
> Anna
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Terry L Parker 
>   To: [email protected] 
>   Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 1:07 AM
>   Subject: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
> 
> 
>   Anna, the LIBERTARIAN answer is always 'consensually'  
> 
>   That answer bans fraud and credible threats of physical 
>   aggression from all transactions.  Thus human dignity is 
>   restored by letting each person set values for themselves. 
> 
>   If you value your $10 less than I value an hour of my labor, 
>   we have the basis for voluntary MUTUAL 'exploitation' that 
>   is of happy benefit to us both  :)  
> 
>   -Terry Liberty Parker 
>   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
> 
> 
> 
>   --- In [email protected], "Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   >
>   > Good question, what is an exploitation then?
>   > I would say robbing others of their honest pay for an honest 
>   effort, or duping less privileged into accepting a deal which 
will 
>   rob him of what is owned them fair and square. But, what is fair 
and 
>   square?
>   >  Example: two men seek work. They decide to form a contractor 
team. 
>   One seeks the contracts, the other  does the physical job.
>   > The guy who seeks contracts charges 50 dollars per foot of a 
>   finished home.  But since  the ongoing rate for a physical work 
is 10 
>   dollars , this is how much he will pay his partner/worker  
himself 
>   taking the rest. 
>   >  How do you think the money should be divided? 
>   > Anna
>   > 
>   >   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   >   From: M.A. Johnson 
>   >   To: [email protected] 
>   >   Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 9:51 PM
>   >   Subject: Re: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   Anna
>   >       Financial competition  fosters greed and
>   >       exploitation. Show me one example where
>   >       it does not.
>   >   MJ
>   >   What is 'greed'?
>   >   In a mutual contract, who is 'exploited'?
>   > 
>   >   Anna
>   >   Capitalism  on the other hand  thrives on these traits. But
>   >   it does not mean that the results  can be  positive. Financial
>   >   competition without a sense of inner justice must always
>   >   end in violence.   To remedy, you need the laws. But... when
>   >   you introduce too many laws, it no longer is libertarian, is 
it?
>   > 
>   >   MJ
>   >   When you introduce laws (Government intervention), it is
>   >   no longer Capitalism, but instead another variant of
>   >   Socialism.
>   > 
>   >   Regard$,
>   >   --MJ
>   > 
>   >   There is simply no other choice than this: either
>   >   abstain from interference in the free play of the
>   >   market, or to delegate the entire management of
>   >   production and distribution to the government.
>   >   Either capitalism or socialism: there exists no
>   >   middle way. -- Ludwig von Mises
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > ----------------------------------------------------------------
----
>   ----------
>   >   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
>   > 
>   >     a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
>   >       
>   >     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>   >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   >       
>   >     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! 
Terms 
>   of Service. 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > ----------------------------------------------------------------
----
>   ----------
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>   >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
> 
> 
> 
>   SPONSORED LINKS E government  Libertarian  E government strategy  
>         Libertarian party  E government procurement  
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
>   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
> 
>     a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
>       
>     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       
>     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms 
of Service. 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to