To remedy one contradiction, your provide another: How do know that one of those artists/arts you reject won't be "rediscovered" and "appreciated" later? Is it possible you could be mistaken in any of your art assessments? If so, then the regulations you propose only consist of non-consensual aggression against people who hurt no one. (I'm not sure how lousy art hurts anyone anyway.)
-Mark _____ You misunderstood. People have the right to chose what they want. But we are not talking about human choices and tastes, by artists who often are too advanced for their times and thus unwanted. Yet, as it often happens, few years or even a hundred years later, they are rediscovered and appreciated. What I was trying to say, that artists need to be protected. And there should be some regulations to prevent abuse by the con men. We would not want parasites to claim that they are artists, you must agree. Anna _____ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
