Anna, I do NOT agree with defining the loving act of charity 
as an obligation!  

A person can do something out of agreed upon DUTY (obligation) 
OR out of LOVE.  For example, a woman can sexually satisfy 
her man as a 'duty' OR as a an act of 'love'  What would 
you think of the man who didn't know, or even care to know, 
the difference.  

The children (develping humans) I have helped to raise 
(stewardship), and the many more I've been around, DO 
naturally share; though not always when some adult wants.  
*IF* a child is given sufficient 'domain' AND are secure 
in their 'domain' (their body and justly held possessions) 
FEAR is reduced and is NATUALLY replaced by love.  ALSO, 
children who ARE 'secure' in their just 'property rights' 
WANT to share playthings with their playmates (win/win)  

Negating the security of a developing person's domain (body 
and justly held possessions) will NATURALLY induce more FEAR
and insecurity. SOME adults do this by coercing 'sharing'  
Are we surprised that this ESCALATES to MORE authoritarianism?  

If you want a more loving society, stop redefining that which 
persons do out of 'love' into 'duty' (obligation)  


-Terry Liberty Parker 
Please see what I wrote in 
What's at the Heart of What Libertarians are Selling? 
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/30419



--- In [email protected], "Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Terry,   Charity has to be taught,  a person is not born with 
it. 
> It  is taught by making it a moral obligation. These is also how 
children are taught values.  
>  
> The only thing that separates man from animal is altruism.  
> Anna
> 
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Terry L Parker 
>   To: [email protected] 
>   Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 9:17 PM
>   Subject: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
> 
> 
>   Anna, what is the 'spirit' behind redefining acts of love 
>   as being acts of obligation; and what can be said of those 
>   who don't know the difference?  
> 
>   -Terry Liberty Parker 
>   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
> 
> 
>   --- In [email protected], "Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   >
>   > But honestly, should we not share  our good fortune with those 
who 
>   are sick, old or disabled? A society that ignores its poor, 
cannot 
>   be  healthy or morally strong. Do  you want to resurrect Sparta?  
>   > Anna
>   >   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   >   From: James Landrith 
>   >   To: [email protected] 
>   >   Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 5:53 PM
>   >   Subject: RE: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   Umm, because, like welfare is not magic money.  And stuff.
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   It comes via the state sponsored theft of others.
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   Feel free to donate all you wish to help others (and I do), 
but 
>   the moment
>   >   you empower government to take it from one person and give it 
to 
>   another you
>   >   become a party to theft.
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   Does that about sum it up?
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   
__________________________________________________________________
>   >   James Landrith
>   >   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   >   cell: 703-593-2065 * fax: 760-875-8547
>   >   AIM: jlnales * ICQ: 148600159
>   >   MSN and Yahoo! Messenger: jlandrith
>   >   Taking the Gloves Off -  <http://www.jameslandrith.com>
>   >   http://www.jameslandrith.com
>   >   The Multiracial Activist -  <http://www.multiracial.com>
>   >   http://www.multiracial.com
>   >   The Abolitionist Examiner -  
>   <http://www.multiracial.com/abolitionist/>
>   >   http://www.multiracial.com/abolitionist/
>   >   
__________________________________________________________________
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >     _____  
>   > 
>   >   From: [email protected] 
>   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>   >   Behalf Of Anna
>   >   Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 7:45 PM
>   >   To: [email protected]
>   >   Subject: Re: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   Basically, you are against the welfare. What is your argument?
>   >   Anna
>   >     ----- Original Message ----- 
>   >     From: Paul 
>   >     To: [email protected] 
>   >     Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 8:00 AM
>   >     Subject: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
>   > 
>   > 
>   >     The poor, elderly, and infirmed would have more help under a
>   >     completely free market system than they do with the 
government 
>   system
>   >     now.  They'd get help from friends, family, neighbors, 
their 
>   church,
>   >     private charities, and others who want to help.  And unlike 
the 
>   money
>   >     the government collects, the vast majority would make it to 
>   those in
>   >     need, the care given would be by people who genuinely care 
>   about the
>   >     well-being of those in need, and nobody would be robbed to 
pay 
>   for it
>   >     so there would be no animosity towards them.
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   SPONSORED LINKS E government  Libertarian  E government 
strategy  
>   >         Libertarian party  E government procurement  
>   > 
>   > 
>   > ----------------------------------------------------------------
----
>   ----------
>   >   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
>   > 
>   >     a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
>   >       
>   >     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>   >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   >       
>   >     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! 
Terms 
>   of Service. 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > ----------------------------------------------------------------
----
>   ----------
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>   >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
>   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
> 
>     a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
>       
>     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       
>     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms 
of Service. 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to