I'm a computer network engineer and think as logically as a computer, so I feel qualified to answer this question.
A computer would say that we are BORN with rights, and that all humans have sole dominion over their own body and the organisms within that body so it doesn't matter when human life begins because NOTHING has any rights while it is inside the body of a person. Rights start at birth and not one second before. --- In [email protected], Deus Ex Machina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > < its not people are prone to > > bias, its just that people _are_ subjective.> > > > > yes, that is why we need an objective computer to keep order... > > really? lets try an example. > > person A says life doesnt start till the baby leaves the womb as its > still attached to the mother. > > person B says life starts at some point when the fetus start to respond > to stimulus. > > person C says life starts at conception as its clearly a living growing > organism. > > when does your computer say the babys rights start? why are the other two wrong? > > where is the objective evidence for the computers choice? > > Vic > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/WpTY2A/izNLAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
