Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ok, so are you denying that we have sole dominion over our own lives > and body (including the organisms within them)? This means you're > saying that someone else can have more of a claim on your body than > you do. This is the exact opposite of the premise of libertarianism. > > Either that or you are denying that natural law exists. Which is it?
both. the current system already doesnt give you rights to your own dna. > Do you deny that gravity exists or do you deny that we own ourselves? you can measure gravity, how do you measure natural law? > One can not be a libertarian while denying natural law, natural > rights, or sole dominion over our lives and bodies (including the > organisms within). > > If you're not a libertarian, I understand completely. Then it makes > sense that you're claiming that some organism living in a person's > body has more of a claim on that person's body than they do for > themselves, but if you are a libertarian, you know this is bullshit. > > You either take self-ownership as a fact or you don't. There is no in > between. even your position is not self consistent if you claim a person as dominion over there own body then an unborn child should have dominion over its own body, just because it gets food from the mother means nothing. Vic ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/WpTY2A/izNLAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
