< I'm sure parasites have their own rights, but they are
species-specific to that organism.>

By this definition, we are the parasites too as we depend on other animals and 
plants as our food; on air to give us oxygen thus depleting the earth's 
atmosphere etc...  We have very specific needs and to satisfy them,  we 
parasite other life forms. Do you think there is much difference between a 
virus killing a cow and a man killing a  cow? Both do it for their survival. A 
parasite gives nothing in return, what have we given back to the earth besides  
polution? 
Anna

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: mark robert 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 1:24 PM
  Subject: RE: objective vs subjective Re: [Libertarian] Re: 
Socialism/Capitalism of the Author


  I think rights are closely related to the survival instinct of
  all organisms.



  I'm sure parasites have their own rights, but they are
  species-specific to that organism. Organisms generally prioritize
  their own kind over others. Humans have the mental ability to
  understand the survival instinct of other species, but that's not
  the same as actively equating their rights to our own. Life
  generally sees all other species as fair game (potential
  FOOD/resources), without rights. In other words, an Earthworm
  will tell you he has equal rights, but a Robin will tell you
  otherwise. Each is correct, but only in context of his own
  species. 



  Rights are generally in accord with taxonomical hierarchies. Like
  supports like. Intra-generic species will be more likely to
  support each other than species from another genus. In other
  words, I might regard apes as having more rights than lizards,
  but that's only because I am a hominid - but I support members of
  my own species much more than apes. As you go down into
  specifics, rights become stronger, finally ending up with
  individual specimens (of same species > sub-species > variations
  > nationalities > communities > church groups > relatives >
  friends > families > spouse > self). It would seem to be a
  natural/universal "law" amongst biological organisms. 



  Our membership in the club of life gives us our rights - to
  support and advance our "selves" (how ever specific you want to
  define that) - over and above those of others if necessary. 



  I hope that made some sense.







    _____  



  Nevertheless, is life sacred or not? If this is a fundamental
  axiom of existence, then everything what lives, has the right to
  live, including a parasite.
  Anna




    _____  



  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

    a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
      
    b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
      
    c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to