Your mixing a battle with a war here Andre. Grant isn't fighting toll roads in a collective sense, but rather one toll road. The highway bill remains in exhistance, if it did not, perhaps Grant's position on this one toll road would change, but it does, and in fighting this one toll road, you have to udnerstand, Grant would not be supporting the highway bill, nor would he be attacking toll roads in a collective sense.
You have to make the best judgement of the situation at hand, while working for a beter over all system. Granted, like you I do not know the exact situation here, but I can see the potential for it to be justified. Its something best left to the decision of some one in Caldwell Country. --- In [email protected], Andre Kenji de Sousa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2006/2/17, uncoolrabbit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Andre, I think the first problem is that this road was already paid > > for by tax money, > > > The problem is that the maintenance costs of a road are expensive. I don´t > know this road, but most highways have a heavy maintenance cost. Sometimes, > in few years, it can be so expensive as the cost to build the highway. > > My impression is that the libertarians in this case are demanding the > carless taxpayer to pay for the maintenance of the road. I think that > libertarians should fight for the end of the highway bill and the > privatization of the Interstate Highway System, not fighting against toll > roads. > > André > > > http://www.andrekenji.com.br > Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/andken/ > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
