David, honestly.  If you had graduated from Yale and Harvard, served 
as a Fighter Pilot in the Air Force Reserves, been Governor of Texas 
for 6 years, owner of a major league baseball team, and President of 
the US for 4 years, would you think it'd be fair to invite someone 
to debate you, who never held elective office, never finished 
college, never served in the military, and never established himself 
in any meaningful way in the businesse world?

Do credentials count for anything with you at all?  

I mean inviting Nadar, yeah.  The guy's got a heluva background.  
Even Ron Paul, Libertarian or even former state legislator Andre 
Marrou, Libertarian, maybe?  

If you had nominated Ed Thompson, the media would have had a field 
day with that - former Mayor, professional boxer, and brother of HUD 
Secretary Tommy Thompson.  It would have been very difficult for 
Bush to evade inviting Ed Thompson to the debates.

But you did not.  You went for the most obscure, unqualified 
candidate you could find.  








--- In [email protected], "David Macko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The people of the United States have experienced "experienced" 
leaders for
> over ninety years. If we are subjected to much more of 
such "experience"
> we will soon experience a police state, World War III and a one-
world 
> totalitarian
> government caused by "experienced" leaders such as Bush and his 
neocon 
> henchmen
> and henchwoman.
> If Bush believed he could fulfill your scenario he would have 
debated 
> Michael Badnarik.
> Personally, I think that the result of such an enjoyable fantasy 
would have 
> been quite
> similar to the result of the debate at the Convention, where 
Badnarik came 
> from third
> place and won.
> 
> For life and liberty,
> David Macko
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Eric Dondero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "General Libertarian" 
<[email protected]>; "libertarian 
> republicans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 8:32 AM
> Subject: [Libertarian] NY GOP Senate Primary; Important lesson for 
> Libertarians
> 
> 
> Read the first few paragraphs of the following article.  Notice 
what 
> McFarland is attacking Spencer on?   Credentials and lack of 
Resume!
> 
>   It's a valid criticism.  While Mayor of Yonkers it sort of 
decent, it 
> doesn't rise to the level of United States Senator, whereas 
Mcfarland's 
> background does.
> 
>   Kind of reminds you of the Libertarian Party, no?  They run 
someone - 
> Michael Badnarik - for President of the United States in 2004 WHO 
WAS NEVER 
> EVEN ELECTED DOG CATCHER.
> 
>   Lesson for Libertarians.  Credentials in politics matter.  If 
you don't 
> have 'em someone will call you on it.
> 
>   Imagine if Badnarik somehow had made it into the debates along 
with Nader; 
> Bush, Kerry, Nader & Badnarik.  Let's pretend that the liberal 
media forced 
> the debate authorities to let in Nader, but then Kerry not wanting 
to lose 
> all the votes to the Left, demanded Badnarik be let in, as well 
(This is not 
> a far-fetched scenario; remember that Kerry ran against 
libertarian William 
> Weld for US Senate and slammed Weld repeatedly for being 
a "libertarian," so 
> he knows full well who libertarians are.)
> 
>   Now imagine that Bush was getting creamed by Badnarik on issue 
after 
> issue.
> 
>   Don't you think that Bush would destroy Badnarik in one swoop 
with the 
> question, "Mr. Badnarik, though you seem to be a nice fellow... 
what 
> political office have you ever held?  What qualifications do you 
have to be 
> Commander in Chief?  I note you never even served in the 
Military.  And how 
> can we take your views on domestic matters seriously when you've 
never had 
> to manage budget as I did for 6 years as Governor of the Nation's 
2nd 
> largest State."
> 
>   The solution is simple; LIBERTARIAN PARTY NOMINATE SOMEONE WITH 
SOME 
> BACKGROUND IN 2008 - A JESSE VENTURA OR GARY JOHNSON, at the very 
least an 
> Ed Thompson or Don Gorman (!!!) not some Party Activist with 
little if any 
> political background.
> 
>   Rep for N.Y. Senate Hopeful Jabs GOP Rival
>         By BETH FOUHY, AP Political Writer Fri Mar 17, 9:29 PM ET
> 
> 
>   NEW YORK - The top adviser to Kathleen Troia "KT" McFarland said 
Friday 
> that her rival for the Republican Senate nomination, former 
Yonkers Mayor 
> John Spencer, lacked the credentials, knowledge and financial 
backing to 
> mount a credible challenge to Sen.    [input]   [input]   [input] 
Hillary 
> Rodham Clinton
> ' name=c1>  [input] SEARCH
> News | News Photos | Images | Web
> ' name=c3> Hillary Rodham Clinton.
>           ADVERTISEMENT
>           Get Our Top 20® Newsletter
> in Your Inbox Each Week!    The Most "WOW!" Travel Deals
> on the Internet - here's a sampling:  Released
> MAR 15, 2006         Fly to London in April/May (each way)  $199 & 
up 
> British Airways        7-Night Cruise on Top-Rated Ship, in 
September  $399 
> Vacation Outlet        96-Hour Sale at 9 Luxurious Resorts  $96  
RockResorts 
> Puerto Rico 4-Star Getaway at Half-OFF  $489  CheapCaribbean.com 
> Click on Any Deal and Check Them Out Today!
> *Fares listed may not include all taxes, charges and government 
fees.
> More information. © 2006 Travelzoo Inc.   if (window.yzq_a == 
null) 
> document.write("");      if (window.yzq_a) { yzq_a('p', 
> 'P=SQ2Ko0SOwhU5FoRWRBgStwKUDLPmzUQcCSYADDK4&T=1arpf67dd%2fX%
3d1142688038%2fE%3d8903521%2fR%3dnews%2fK%3d5%2fV%3d1.1%2fW%3d8%2fY%
3dYAHOO%2fF%3d3211164535%2fH%
3dY2FjaGVoaW50PSJuZXdzIiBjb250ZW50PSJSZXB1YmxpY2FuO0l0O2VsZWN0aW9uO3N
lY3VyaXR5O2hlbHA7bW9uZXk7aXQ7RGVtb2NyYXRpYztmdW5kO3JlZnVybF9teV95YWhv
b19jb20iIHJlZnVybD0icmVmdXJsX215X3lhaG9vX2NvbSIgdG9waWNzPSJyZWZ1cmxfb
XlfeWFob29fY29tIg--%2fS%3d1%2fJ%3d1F47BFD1'); 
> yzq_a('a', 
> '&U=139ja3oa2%2fN%3dJkKLq9G_RvU-%2fC%
3d398063.7973856.8977478.1442997%2fD%3dLREC%2fB%3d3373285'); 
>  }
>   "It would be a very big mistake to think John Spencer - no 
offense to 
> John, who I guess was a decent enough mayor - to move him to a 
level of 
> where anyone is going to take him seriously as a U.S. Senate 
candidate," 
> McFarland adviser Ed Rollins told The Associated 
Press. "Unfortunately, John 
> Spencer wouldn't know which side of the Capitol the U.S. Senate 
meets."
>   Spencer called Rollins' remarks "arrogant and condescending," 
and said he 
> would match his credentials against anyone in the race.
>   A Republican primary is shaping up in New York between moderate 
and 
> conservative forces, pitting McFarland, a wealthy Manhattanite who 
supports 
> abortion and gay rights, against Spencer, a tough-talking 
conservative with 
> blue-collar roots who opposes abortion.
>   The winner of the Sept. 12 GOP primary will face Clinton, who's 
heavily 
> favored to win re-election in November.
>   Rollins, a longtime GOP strategist best known for running 
President 
> [input]   [input]   [input] Ronald Reagan
> ' name=c1>  [input] SEARCH
> News | News Photos | Images | Web
> ' name=c3> Ronald Reagan's 1984 re-election campaign, said Spencer 
was too 
> conservative to win statewide in New York.
>   And Spencer's experience as Yonkers mayor, Rollins said, offered 
little 
> preparation for foreign policy challenges and other matters that 
come before 
> the Senate.
>   McFarland, who served as a    [input]   [input]   [input] 
Pentagon
> ' name=c1>  [input] SEARCH
> News | News Photos | Images | Web
> ' name=c3> Pentagon official in the Reagan administration, has 
made foreign 
> policy and homeland security the centerpiece of her campaign.
>   Rollins also said Spencer's candidacy would fail to attract 
Republican 
> donors who might otherwise be eager to help defeat Clinton.
>   "If he is the nominee of this party, there are no money people 
anywhere 
> that are going to come," Rollins said.
>   For his part, Spencer dismissed Rollins' "elitist" tone.
>   "Those are pretty derogatory comments based on zero knowledge of 
me," said 
> Spencer, noting his candidacy had persevered while party favorites 
such as 
> former Westchester County District Attorney Jeanine Pirro and 
attorney 
> Edward Cox had dropped out.
>   Rollins also had tough words for state Republican Party chairman 
Stephen 
> Minarik, who earlier this week indicated he favored Spencer over 
McFarland.
>   Rollins said Minarik, in a private conversation, said the party 
would 
> consider it a victory to keep Clinton under the 71 percent vote 
collected by 
> Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer in his landslide 2004 re-election 
win over 
> former Orange County GOP Assemblyman Howard Mills, who had 24 
percent of the 
> vote.
>   "From my perspective, if getting 24 percent of the vote is a 
victory, than 
> we probably need a new party chairman and we probably need a new 
thought 
> process," Rollins said Friday.
>   Minarik aide Ryan Moses dismissed Rollins' characterization of 
the 
> chairman's comments as "absurd," saying they were probably made in 
jest.
>   "It's crazy to think the Republican state committee's goal is 
not to have 
> more than 24 percent of the vote. The focus of the state party is 
to win 
> elections," said Moses, the party's executive director.
>   Rollins added Friday that Adam Goodman, who produced campaign 
commercials 
> for New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani's 1997 re-election bid and 
his 
> short-lived Senate campaign in 2000, would be McFarland's media 
adviser. 
> The campaign's fund raising effort will be led by Ann Dunsmore, a 
prominent 
> California consultant. The Tarrance Group will handle polling.   
McFarland, 
> who announced earlier this month that she would enter the 
Republican contest 
> to challenge Clinton, acknowledged this week she had failed to 
vote in 
> several elections and was registered to vote in two places in 
violation of 
> state law.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Eric Dondero, Interpreter & ESL Instructor
> 
> Author of "Worldwide Multilingual Phrase Book," "Vacation Spanish" 
& "Ingles 
> Real".
> 
> http://www.houstoninterpreter.com
>








ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to