Eric,
I believe you had said a signed pledge is force. I asked what
kind of force. I said I thought it sounded like a contract. I
asked if you view contracts as aggression. I don't think any of
that was too technical or off topic; it was simple and directly
responsive to your comments. So, if you don't mind, the questions
still stand.
-Mark
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
_____
I'm not sure what your question is below? You're getting a bit
too
technical IMHO. Not quite sure what all this has to do with
electing more libertarians to public office?
--- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Eric,
>
>
>
> Sounds like some LP groups require a signature and others
don't.
> Nonetheless, you think it's force. Is it the kind of force that
> qualifies as the initiation of aggression (the one that
> libertarianism is against)? Or is it the kind of force to which
> you agreed to abide when you voluntarily joined this group? To
> me, it sounds more like a contract. Do you view consensual
> contracts as aggression?
>
>
>
> -Mark
>
_____
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
