Uncool,
Could you please explain / re-write your post. I honestly can't
figure out what you are saying. You may actually have some good
points, but I hesitate to reply on a hunch. Your writing is
impossible to read because your grammar and punctuation are
almost non-existent. Also, it might help if you would stop
repeatedly misspelling the topic on which you wish to be heard
opining: "PROHIBITION".
-Mark
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
_____
That appears like poor logic to appose prohabition... The lack of
prohibition on nicotine products, and the far greater devestation
to
peoples nicotine causes as a legal substance makes you beleive
that,
thus, the ilegal substances, the some of wich far more powerfull
than nicotine, should also be legal... because......?
Not my position here, just pointing out you just gave an argument
for prohibition as your argument against it.
_____
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
