And I see the staunch Bush supporters blinded, by what I am not so bold to single out ot one thing, nor do I have time to list some of the many possible factors. I will say that the facts are that Bush policy has not resulted in greater protection. I will argue that my personal opinion is that Bush policy has decreased american security, and damaged personal liberties and the american economy. So go on blind if you desire, both left and right. Hopefully libertarians will keep there eyes open to tell when you are about to walk off a cliff or into a wall.
--- In [email protected], "Geof Gibson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero Rittberg" > <ericdondero@> wrote: > > > > Isn't it amazing the inconsistency of the libertarian > > anti-War advocacy Geoff? > > > > They claim they support civil liberties, but say absolutely nothing > > about the Islamo-fascist murder of Theo van Gogh in the Netherlands. > > They don't care at all about the rising tide of Islamo-fascists > > threatening and sometimes physically attacking Gays, > > Lesbians, Marijuana smokers, Nudists, and other Alternative > > Lifestyles champions throughout Western Europe. They don't say a > > peep about authoritarianism using Islam as a pretext for violent > > riots all across Europe over silly little cartoon depictions of > > the "Prophet" Muhammed. They say nothing when the paranoia even > > seeps into the US, like Borders pulling Free Inquiry off their > > shelves for fear of violent authoritarian reprisals that use Islam > > as pretext. > > > > It's almost like to the Anti-War Libertarianism, Social Freedoms be > > damned. If it conflicts with a hard Left hate Bush Pacifistic > > agenda, Social Freedoms get thrown out like a baby in the bath > > water. > > > > For a long time I have pointed out how the Libertarian anti Bush crowd > sounds exactly like the Socialist Left. I beieve that both of these > groups have personalized the issue and are blinded by their hate for > Bush. If they have their way, I see the free people of the US > attacked more often and more viciously by the Islamofascists until > abreaking point would be reached. At that time, it would be like > after Pearl arbor and total war would be waged with a far more > damaging and destructive cost than defeating the terrorists earlier. > This campaign against the terrorists should consist of political as > well as military measures, but, in my study of human nature, I have > come to the conclusion that the type of hate, intolerene, and > prejudice we are confronted with can only be defeated by eliminating > it rather then 'talking to the terrorists.' > > That is one reason why I am not really worried about the Libertarians > who refuse to acknowledge the Islamofascist threat. The end result > may unfortunately be more bodies, but I believe freedom will prevail. > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
