--- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And I see the staunch Bush supporters blinded, by what I am not so > bold to single out ot one thing, nor do I have time to list some of > the many possible factors. I will say that the facts are that Bush > policy has not resulted in greater protection. I will argue that my > personal opinion is that Bush policy has decreased american > security, and damaged personal liberties and the american economy. > So go on blind if you desire, both left and right. Hopefully > libertarians will keep there eyes open to tell when you are about to > walk off a cliff or into a wall. >
Good idea to keep our eyes open. And please, don't mistake my ability to see the threat of Islamofascism as staunch or even lukewarm support for Bush. Bush is not a conservative and has been a great disappointment on many things including the unconscionable expansion of Medicare. I recently read an interesting article by Fred Barnes defining Bush as a 'strong government conservative.' I believe this to be an accurate descrition but philosophically inconsistent with fundamental principles of conservatism. You can be of any political philosophy and still identify the threat of Islamofascism. It is the solutions we advocate which differentiate us. Of course, anyone can deny the threat as well. Only history will be the final judge. ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
