Wrong. In otherwords the property you pay for, have the reciept and deed for is yours alone and I have no claim to it, but if you want to bring that property across my nations borders, you must pay for the PRIVILEGE to do so. Your property rights DO NOT entitle you to bring your goods across national borders.
No matter who you bought it from, who you negotiated the price with, whom you purchased it from, etc. you DO NOT have the right to transport those goods across national borders. You may have this PRIVILEGE if you choose to pay for it. And this has nothing to do whatsoever with your ownership of those goods and does not infringe on your ownership rights in even the slightest way. If you buy something online, you often have to pay for shipping costs. Does this mean they're infringing on your ownership of the item? Not at all. Shipping costs are unrelated to the cost of the item itself and do not effect your ownership of the goods. I have never said the Constitution gives me the right to infringe on your property or your rights and I've never suggested that anyone should infringe on your property or rights. I've only stated the FACT that tariffs do not infringe upon your property or your rights, and in fact have nothing to do with your ownership or rights. You have claimed a right you do not have. You have suggested that by buying property, you are magically given carte blanche to take your goods into any country on the globe to do with them as you please regardless of whether the people of that country want you there or not. This is obviously not the case. --- In [email protected], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > It's my mall. And if you want to sell goods in it, you must pay rent. > > The fact that you're required to pay rent does not infringe on your > > property rights or mean I'm using force against you. You're talking > > about selling your goods on my property not yours. Your property > > rights DO NOT mean you have the right to bring your goods across > > national borders to sell them. Tariffs don't violate your property > > rights and aren't an infringement of your rights. You are free > > not to import goods. If you choose to import goods, you're CHOOSING pay the > > tariffs. If you smuggle them in, you're committing an act of > > aggression and trespass. > > So in other words, the property that I pay for, have a deed/bill of sale to is in actuality yours for no other reason than you say so. Despite the fact that I paid for it and not you, despite the fact that I negotiated the price and not you, and despite the fact that the previous owner agreed with me to sell it to me and not to you. And don't try to claim that the constitution gives you, Paul, the right or even priviledge to invade my private property and tell me and my guests what we may do there. It does not say that or any thing like that. > > BWS > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
