Very few people lack property, if you count wealth (income, savings, etc.) as property. Otherwise, it's a terrible analogy. It suggests that if the corporation of the United States dissolves, there would be no property ownership of any kind.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 9:32 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Libertarian] Re: Immigration From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > We own property and that property is one share of stock in the > corporation. All I did was explain why it's not an initiation of > force to have tariffs or enforce them. A) Not everyone owns property. B) You used an analogy that is not representative of the situation. BWS ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian SPONSORED LINKS Libertarian English language Political parties Online dictionary American politics ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS a.. Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web. b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
