-TLP
--- In [email protected], Cory Nott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I always ask why as well. It's a fair question and should be asked.
However, I don't want to be standing isolated in an ivory tower
whilst asking the question. The room tends to echo and the people
below are too busy to even hear the question, let alone would bother
to answer it.
>
>
>
>
> Terry L Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cory, I think you concede too much ground to authoritarianism!
>
> I don't care if the person I'm talking politics with is in or or
> nowhere near the LP (church?). I will STILL ask that person to
> explain why THEY think it's 'OK' to initiate, or do a credible
threat
> to initiate, physical force upon an innocent person or their justly
> held possessions; AND insist that they PROVE their point or abandon
> their evil advocacy ('put up or shut up')
>
> Unless you're Tony Soprano reminding his gang who's boss, burden of
> proof is on the aggression advocate.
>
>
> -Terry Liberty Parker
> Please see what I wrote in
> LIMITED vs UNIVERSAL Libertarianism
> at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/47412
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
