[ModeratorNote: to BOTH Paul and Boyd,

This exchange has degenerated to the point of having NO content that
would contribute to an understanding of LIBERTARIANISM  

This tedious repetition of 'You lied'
followed by  'I did not, but you lied'

is, imo, turning into a bar brawl that the both of you must now
take 'outside' (of this forum)

Boyd, moderation has been imposed upon Paul for some time now; but
I'm trusting you to self-moderate in this matter. 


-TLP  ]



Once again, I have not lied at all.  Not one word I've ever said on
this board (or any other) is a lie.  Each and every single thing I've
ever said has been truthful, factual, logical, reasonable, and 100%
libertarian. 

Your neverending stream of baseless accusations, lies, and mudslinging
toward me don't change this fact. 


--- In [email protected], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Once again you lie.  Totally.  Completely.  Each and every line
contains a complete and total lie.  That is truly impressive.  Not
libertarian of course, but impressive.
>
> BWS
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 9:47 am
> Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Purity
>
> > You mean like accurately describing a tariff as not using the
> > initiation of force?  And for those who smuggle goods across national
> > borders of initiating force?  And thoroughy proving logically,
> > reasonably, intelligently, and from a libertarian perspective that not
> > all taxes are theft, and not all taxes amount to the initiation of
> > force while disproving every inaccurate, false, and misleading
> > statement you tried to make to the contrary?
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In [email protected], <boyd.w.smith@> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Paul <ptireland@>
> > > > Wrong.  Comparing Christianity to Libertarianism is an absolutely
> > > > perfect analogy.  Christianity has a set belief system and so
> > does
> > > > libertarianism.  Christianity has a core belief that separates
> > its
> > > > belief system from others.  In this case the belief in Jesus of
> > > > Nazareth.  In the case of Libertarianism it's the believe in
> > and
> > > > support of the non-aggression principle.  If someone does not
> > > > believe
> > > > in the nap, the term "libertarianism" is as inappropriate for
> > them
> > > > as
> > > > is "Christianity" for a Satan worshiping. 
> > > >
> > > > All paths do not lead to liberty.  Some lead to aggression,
> > and those
> > > > that lead to aggression always lead away from liberty. 
> > Aggression in
> > > > the name of liberty is like rape in the name of virginity.
> > >
> > > Exactly like supporting tariffs and saying it isn't a tax when it
> > really is.  And then denying that fact that all taxes are initiated
> > aggression.
> > >
> > > BWS
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>









ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to