John,
My point is to respectfully disagree with your support of
environmental laws, as you stated it:
"The 'new and improved' Bush Supreme Court has shown it's true
intent.
They will work to bring about the neocon agenda...weaken the
environmental laws it took decades of hard fighting to bring
about."
-Mark
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
-------------
Yes....and your point is?
On 6/19/06, mark robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> John,
>
> I don't consider environmental laws libertarian. Nor do I
> consider weakening them, or any other such
> prohibition/regulation/legislation, anti-libertarian.
>
> -Mark
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yHUd1C/hOaOAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
