I do not believe that prostitution should be illegal except where
it would break a contract.
That is the libertarian position.
For life, liberty, justice and peace,
David Macko
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul T. Ireland
To: David Macko
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The
Fallacy of Open I
I read 100% of your post and like virtually all of your other posts, it is
the polar opposite of the libertarian position.
On 9/18/06, David Macko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My position is the pure libertarian viewpoint, as you should see if you
took time to read my response.
David Macko
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 2:00 PM
Subject: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The
Fallacy of Open I
He was answering my question about using the government to make laws
enforcing religious morality (specifically laws pertaining to fidelity
) because he stated that he'd support the freedom of
"unmarried/unengaged" women to have any sex they wanted if they were
over the age of 18 which is a disturbing and extremely non-libertarian
viewpoint.
--- In [email protected], "ma ni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David,
>
> What does that have to do with your advocacy of state-prohibited
> interracial marriage? As you can see, there is great doubt about
> what exactly you do believe.
>
> -Mark
>
> ++++++++++++++++
>
> I believe that the only legitimate purposes of government are
> to
> protect the lives, liberty and property of innocent persons.
> The purpose
> of government is not to prevent sins which do not harm innocent
> third
> parties without their consent. Sins which harm innocent third
> parties
> without their consent, such as murder, rape, robbery or fraud,
> should be
> punished by a legitimate government. It is a proper purpose of
> government,
> derived from protection of property, to uphold voluntarily
> arranged
> contracts among adults. Without the sanctity of contracts no
> free
> society could survive.
> If a woman voluntarily agrees to faithfully, lovingly and
> obediently
> serve the pleasure of a husband, she would be in violation of
> that
> contract and committing fraud if she served the pleasure of
> another
> man for money, i.e. as a harlot, whore, prostitute etc. or for
> fun
> i.e. as a slut, loose woman, promiscuous woman, tramp etc. Due
> to sexual diseases,
> the fraud could have deadly consequences for her husband or
> fiancé
> or cause him great financial loss if she conceived a bastard
> and her husband
> falsely believed that it was his child and provided the child
> with food,
> clothing, shelter, health care and education until adulthood.
> Therefore, such fraud violation should be punishable in a
> libertarian
> society. Other possible limiting contracts might include
> teaching at a Christian
> school, but marriage, including engagement to be married, is
> obviously the most important.
>
> For life, liberty, justice and peace,
> David Macko
>
--
Your Friend in Liberty,
Paul T. Ireland
Libertarian Congressional Candidate
California - District 35
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.electpaulireland.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
