David,

You are confusing my separation. Americans in 1788 obviously did
NOT have the knowledge we now have. While I agree with you that
NOTA was not a realistic choice for THEM, I disagree that they
wouldn't were they WE (given that the external powers ALLOWED the
choice). It seems you are trying to do the impossible: mix the
past with the present. Also, you imply that NOTA = vacuum; I
disagree.

-Mark

++++++++++++++


Even with the knowledge we now have, I still maintain that the
only choices available to Americans in 1788 were a US government
(Articles of Confederation, Constitution or some other
alternative, none of which was chosen by the Founding Fathers)
British, French or Spanish domination or the mercies of the
merciless Indian savages. NOTA was not an option in those
circumstances. Nature abhors a vacuum.

For life and liberty,
David Macko


NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National
Security Agency may have read this email without warning,
warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or
legislative oversight. You have no recourse nor protection save
to call for the impeachment of the current President.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: ma ni 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 11:14 AM
  Subject: RE: Hard Questions was Re: [Libertarian] Re: Ron Paul:
a Good Thing for the libertarian movement and the Libertarian
Part


  I think here's the variable causing the conflicting answers.
Look
  what we are doing right now and the advantage it gives us.
  Hindsight is 20/20, especially with computers. Of course the
  choices of history WERE limited to those who lived it, but one
of
  the main reasons was lack of information and communications
  technologies. Is the question "what would you have chosen, had
  you had the knowledge you have now", or "what would you have
  chosen, had you only had the best knowledge of the time"? And
  even then, what are the chances you would have had the best
  knowledge of the time? VERY SLIM indeed, I imagine. In other
  words, are "you" going back in time as yourself with your
current
  knowledge, or going back in time as a person/brain/knowledge of
  the time? Big difference! The biggest limitation on any choice
is
  what you know.

  -Mark

  

Reply via email to