"Geir Magnusson Jr." wrote:
> The best solution, I think, is the most minimal and open one, and as I
> see it, the most open one is simply a Jakarta project that acts as a
> container for independent Jakarta mini-projects.

That's what we're doing -- in exactly the same what that tagblibs is a
container for custom tag mini-projects. 

The only functional difference between a Commons package and a Jakarta
product is whether you have to vote a committer into * other * packages. 

One other small difference is that we're putting new packages up to a
vote by all the Commons committers, rather than a PMC board. 

In both cases, we're probably just ahead of the curve, and Jakarta
itself will probably be doing the same things eventually. 

-Ted.

Reply via email to