Costin - I think you skipped a step somewhere in quoting - Ted was
talking to me, I think regarding my rants about committer organization,
not to your stuff. :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > > And the other rule ( that for each component, control is shared among
> > > projects using it ) is intended to solve tensions like the ones between
> > > tomcat and catalina ( i.e. a group/project feeling "ownership" of a
> > > component that is supposed to be shared ) - this rule should make it
> > > possible that after multiple components doing the same thing are present,
> > > project can merge them and choose among them, again without the feeling
> > > of "that's mine and this is yours" - you use it, it's yours too, you can't
> > > claim "your component brakes my code" anymore.
> >
> > This is not expressed in the proposal. If it is important to you, please
> > submit a patch so that we can vote on it.
>
> What about:
>
> xx. Afer a package becomes part of the sandbox, it will be developed in
> common by all projects that will use it.
>
> I'm sorry, I'm not good at this - if someone can re-formulate this in
> english I would apreciate it.
>
> Costin
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
