Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 17:24:54 -0500
From: "Lawrence Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] USB Card

L100/110's IDE channel is Enhanced IDE only. Only a little better than
L50/70's regular ATA. However, L100/100's CardBus slots is connected to its
internal PCI bus which is capable of 132 MBytes/sec. But, the Toshiba
PCMCIA/CardBus controller used in L100/110 does not support DMA. Hence the
limiting factor on how fast a USB 2.0 card can move is the processor speed.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Libretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: [LIB] USB Card


Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 06:28:27 +0000
From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] USB Card

>From: Paul Bristow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I have a USB2 card working on my L100 under Linux.  You definately do not
>need to use the DC adapter for low-power USB 1.1 devices.  I have no idea
>what speed I get as I do not actually own any USB2 peripherals.

A while back I did a bit of research on various kinds of transfer rates, and
came up with this list of theoretical rates depending on a systems
components:

* Ultra DMA ATA/33 hard disk drive  264Mbps (33MB/s)
* Ultra DMA ATA/66 hard disk drive  528Mbps (66MB/s)
* Ultra DMA ATA/100 hard disk drive  800Mbps (100MB/s)
* USB 1.1, supporting 127 devices up to 12 Mbps (1.5MB/s)
* USB 2.0, supporting 127 devices up to 480Mbps (60MB/s)
* Firewire IEEE-1394, supporting 63 devices up to 400Mbps (50MB/s)

So if anyone knows the limitations of bus speeds for the different Libs,
maybe we can determine if, say a Lib o/c to 266MHz would be able to perform
transfers faster with a USB 2.0 interface over USB 1.1.

I would guess the Libs use ATA/33 HDDs, but Ultra DMA?  I don't know enough
about HDD specs.

Matt


_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail





**************************************************************
http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list
http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives

                 -------TO UNSUBSCRIBE-------
Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be
addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text
on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe
              --------TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------
Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest
**************************************************************




**************************************************************
http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list
http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives

                 -------TO UNSUBSCRIBE-------
Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be
addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text
on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe
              --------TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------
Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest
**************************************************************

Reply via email to