On Nov 24, 1:03 pm, Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok. Thanks. I'll have to move to ext/xsl/ then... hmm..actually if we > > want to keep it in xml/ then we'd have to make two layers. > > > ext/xml/xml/ > > ext/xsl/xml/ > > > I'm wondering if we really need the xml/ require-space since we only > > have two possible files to load (libxml and libxsl). > > Naw, you don't it. Way back when, that was me being anal and trying > to emulate/improve some perlisms. I'd break out the build process and > keep them as two separate packages, but 'require "libxml"' or 'require > "libxslt" is sufficiently unique in the universe. :) -sc
Really? Damn. I thought you had suggested we make one package out of it, and I was coming around to that idea. T. _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
