> Are we then talking about: > > ext/xml > ext/xsl > >> Really? Damn. I thought you had suggested we make one package out of >> it, and I was coming around to that idea.
Hrm... I think I was advocating for a single repo, but not single module/package. Regardless of anything I've said in the past, they should definitely be two different modules that get required independently. To maintain the illusion of a single require, however, it would be very appropriate to have libxslt check and see if libxml is loaded, and if it isn't, have libxslt could require libxml automagically. Having developers requiring libxml and libxslt seems redundant, but since libxslt implicitly requires libxml, why not have libxslt manage that dependency behind the scenes? Those that need only libxml can require only libxml. I'd be shocked if libxslt became a self sufficient XML parser without dependencies on libxml (to the point that I'll call it an impossibility). -sc -- Sean Chittenden [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sean.chittenden.org/ _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
