Are we then talking about: ext/xml ext/xsl
? On Nov 25, 2007, at 08:27, Trans wrote: > > > On Nov 24, 1:03 pm, Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Ok. Thanks. I'll have to move to ext/xsl/ then... hmm..actually >>> if we >>> want to keep it in xml/ then we'd have to make two layers. >> >>> ext/xml/xml/ >>> ext/xsl/xml/ >> >>> I'm wondering if we really need the xml/ require-space since we only >>> have two possible files to load (libxml and libxsl). >> >> Naw, you don't it. Way back when, that was me being anal and trying >> to emulate/improve some perlisms. I'd break out the build process >> and >> keep them as two separate packages, but 'require "libxml"' or >> 'require >> "libxslt" is sufficiently unique in the universe. :) -sc > > Really? Damn. I thought you had suggested we make one package out of > it, and I was coming around to that idea. > > T. > _______________________________________________ > libxml-devel mailing list > libxml-devel@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
