On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:02, Sean Chittenden wrote: >> Are we then talking about: >> >> ext/xml >> ext/xsl >> >>> Really? Damn. I thought you had suggested we make one package out of >>> it, and I was coming around to that idea. > > > Hrm... I think I was advocating for a single repo, but not single > module/package. > The packages should be separate, but since xsl may or may not be available, it seemed like an easier build config to manage if the two are separated, with different extconf.rb files. Since they build different .so objects, the directory partition reflects the library output.
> Regardless of anything I've said in the past, they should definitely > be two different modules that get required independently. > libxslt should, without doubt, internally require 'libxml' and raise a LoadError (i think) if it cannot, since all document objects are dependent on libxml. Dan _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
