-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Jon Keating wrote:
| On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:34:01PM +0000, Pollywog wrote: | |> Yes, that's true. Also, if one has SSH access to the machine at |> work, one can sign login to that machine and kill the Licq |> process there, then login to their ICQ account from home. Another |> option is to have a UIN for work and another for home. | | | Killing Licq isn't the best idea. Use the FIFO to change your | status to offline. That is more graceful. | | Jon
If I can weigh-in as a user of Licq, I'd prefer that Licq NOT take the UIN back; for the exact reason that sometimes I leave Licq running at work and I start it up at home.
Also, I think it's too much to ask the user to use the FIFO to shut down Licq. Is there any harm done by killing the process? If so, can't Licq just trap the signal and go offline first?
Thanks for reading and thanks for a great product,
Mark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE//MUPLVH2XJHy9NARApJ9AJ94D0e/MkfuSuqKMF4fN/RjadtAEgCfdQ7y F8I1W7mGdGn/sgMGMaZ3OEQ= =vI23 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Licq-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel
