done. thanks guys

On Apr 10, 11:36 am, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Jorge Ortiz <jorge.or...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Huh?
>
> > lift: snippet, surround, embed, ignore, comet, children, a, form, loc, and
> > with-param are all built-in in liftTagProcessing. Yes, they're overrideable,
> > but imo it'd be nicer if they were Just A Snippet, like, say, lift:msgs.
>
> It's on my to-do list to do a little house cleaning in this area.

http://liftweb.lighthouseapp.com/projects/26102/tickets/34-lift-processing-directives-should-be-implemented-as-snippets

> > lift:bind is just bad naming. it's not actually a directive, it's just what
> > lift:surround looks for to bind at. should probably be called surround:bind
> > or something with a different namespace.
>
> Yeah... we should deprecate <lift:bind/> because it's not the same thing.
>  Please open a defect on this for me.

http://liftweb.lighthouseapp.com/projects/26102/tickets/33-deprecate-liftbind



>
>
>
>
>
> > --j
>
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 1:26 PM, David Pollak <
> > feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Bob,
> >> They are actually the same thing.  Lift's processing directives are simply
> >> built-in snippets.  You can, if you dare, override their functionality. :-)
>
> >> Thanks,
>
> >> David
>
> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:23 AM, bob <rbpas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> if I see <lift:XXXX/>, it could mean one of two things: a directive,
> >>> e.g., <lift:bind/> or <lift:surround/> or shorthand for a snippet, eg
> >>> <lift:myClass> represents <lift:snippet type="MyClass">
>
> >>> i guess I would like to see these disambiguated a shorthand for
> >>> snippets that doesn't overlap with the directive namespace.
>
> >>> some possible solutions:
>
> >>> 1. <lift:bind/> would be the directive and <lift:.bind/> would be the
> >>> snippet. please don't get hung up on my use of dot. it is only an
> >>> example, and not an actual suggestion.
>
> >>> 2. <lift:bind/> maps to a real class, not some internal code, much the
> >>> way <lift:msgs/> maps to net.liftweb.builtin.snippets.Msgs  (thanks
> >>> Jorge)
>
> >>> 3. <lift:bind> is the directive, and <liftsnippet:bind> is the snippet
>
> >>> comments?
>
> >>> thanks, bob
>
> >> --
> >> Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
> >> Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> >> Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
> >> Git some:http://github.com/dpp
>
> --
> Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
> Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
> Git some:http://github.com/dpp
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to