Bob, They are actually the same thing. Lift's processing directives are simply built-in snippets. You can, if you dare, override their functionality. :-)
Thanks, David On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:23 AM, bob <[email protected]> wrote: > > if I see <lift:XXXX/>, it could mean one of two things: a directive, > e.g., <lift:bind/> or <lift:surround/> or shorthand for a snippet, eg > <lift:myClass> represents <lift:snippet type="MyClass"> > > i guess I would like to see these disambiguated a shorthand for > snippets that doesn't overlap with the directive namespace. > > some possible solutions: > > 1. <lift:bind/> would be the directive and <lift:.bind/> would be the > snippet. please don't get hung up on my use of dot. it is only an > example, and not an actual suggestion. > > 2. <lift:bind/> maps to a real class, not some internal code, much the > way <lift:msgs/> maps to net.liftweb.builtin.snippets.Msgs (thanks > Jorge) > > 3. <lift:bind> is the directive, and <liftsnippet:bind> is the snippet > > comments? > > thanks, bob > > > > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
