2016-10-21 22:20 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > >> 2016-10-21 22:06 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>: >>> 2016-10-21 21:55 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >> >>>> Different version number? Or missing support at compilation time? What >>>> does >>>> >>>> ldd <path to LilyPond> >>>> >>>> state here? >>>> >>>> On my self-compiled LilyPond I see >>>> >>>> dak@lola:/usr/local/tmp/lilypond$ ldd out/bin/lilypond >> [...] >>> >>>> What's the set of libraries in the precompiled binary? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> David Kastrup >>> >>> For 2.18.2 I get: >>> >> [...] >>> For self-compiled 2.19.50 I get: >> [...] >> >> Hard to read, thus same attached. > > It's probably sort of a red herring since the readline library is in > neither version. Probably it depends on whether the readline > development headers were available (in a version matching the installed > libreadline on the target system) at the time Gub compiled libguile. > > -- > David Kastrup
I mostly use self-compiled LilyPond which seems to work as it should. I'd call it a bug not to have access to all guile-modules in released version. If I understand correctly the readline-functionality depends on extern librarys, maybe others are missing as well in released versions and nobody ever noticed ... Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
