2016-10-22 9:16 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>: > 2016-10-22 0:37 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>: >> 2016-10-22 0:17 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >>> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> 2016-10-21 23:30 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >>>>> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> I mostly use self-compiled LilyPond which seems to work as it should. >>>>>> I'd call it a bug not to have access to all guile-modules in released >>>>>> version. >>>>> >>>>> libreadline is not a Guile module. It can be loaded at runtime by >>>>> Guile. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe check whether installing libreadline5 or libreadline6 helps: it >>>>> may be that Gub compiled with a certain libreadline version in mind that >>>>> is not installed. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> David Kastrup >>>> >>>> I currently have the following 3 installed: >>>> libreadline5 >>>> libreadline6 >>>> libreadline6-dev >>>> >>>> Should I try removing one? >>> >>> No. All but the -dev ones can be installed in parallel without problem. >>> You can have only one -dev one usually. >>> >>> -- >>> David Kastrup >> >> Ok. >> >> I have GUB-git on my computer, although never tried to compile it on >> my weak laptop I did: >> >> ~/gub (master)$ git grep "libreadline" >> sourcefiles/guile.changelog: * Add readline as build dependency, >> libreadline8 as dependency for >> sourcefiles/guile.changelog: * guile.hint (requires): Update to >> libncurses8, libreadline6. >> sourcefiles/guile.changelog: * Compile against libreadline5 and >> libncurses6. This fixes readline, >> sourcefiles/guile.changelog: * guile.hint: require libreadline5 and >> libncurses6. >> >> The first hit reads in sourcefiles/guile.changelog: >> >> guile (1.8.1-2) unstable; urgency=low >> >> * Add readline as build dependency, libreadline8 as dependency for >> libguile17 (thanks Ted Anderson). >> * Remove /etc/hints. >> * Remove curr from hints. >> >> -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:47:35 +0100 >> >> No idea whether it's important, it's far beyond my depth. >> >> Cheers, >> Harm > > Another observation. > > If installing LilyPond via the precompiled installer, a script called > "lilypond" for calling lilypond from the commandline is created in > bin. > Changing the line (in my case): > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/home/hermann/lilypond/usr/lib" > to > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/home/hermann/lilypond/usr/bin" > seems to work.
Simply commenting the line works as well, afaict Tbh, I've only a vague idea what this line is supposed to do. > > > Cheers, > Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user