Very muchly agreed.  If both are genned, 3215 should be the default, unless
a 3270 is requested (via a parm).  Providing options (without having to
regen the kernel) is the best way to go.

Rich Smrcina
Sytek Services, Inc.
Milwaukee, WI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Catch the WAVV!  Stay for Requirements and the Free for All!
Update your S/390 skills in 4 days for a very reasonable price.
WAVV 2002 in Cincinnati (Fort Mitchell, KY).
April 12-16, 2002
For details see http://www.wavv.org

One nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
----- Original Message -----
From: Post, Mark K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: Turbo 2.4.5 Beta and the Console is nolonger 3215


> If I remember the debates from earlier in the year, if both 3215 and 3270
> console support is defined then 3215 should be the default.  Whether that
is
> how it is implemented in the code, I don't know.  If it is not, and 3270
> console is the default when both are present, then the installation
process
> should show how to specify a 3215 console.  Support for both should be
> generated into the kernels, or the customer should have a choice of
various
> kernels to pick from to match their needs.  They should not have to re-gen
> the kernel just to get the right type of console.  If you have to pick one
> or the other (and you really should not), then go with the 3215.  There's
> going to be a lot more Linux/390 running under VM than otherwise.
>
> Mark Post
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hervey Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Turbo 2.4.5 Beta and the Console is nolonger 3215
>
>
> Chris - The only thing I could think of is that having 3270 support might
> help when using something like the 3270 support module UTS Global offer
> (see their HOWTO at ftp://ftp.utsglobal.com/pub/tub3270/oldstuff/HOWTO).
>          I'm walking over to engineering right now to see what we'll do
> with our 2.4 beta (and upcoming GA's) in terms of switching back to 3215
> support.
>
>          Does anyone else on the list have comments about this?
>
> Thanks,
>          - Hervey Allen
>
> TurboLinux
> Sales Engineer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> T 650-228-5142
>
>
> >Date:    Tue, 18 Dec 2001 22:33:55 -0500
> >From:    Christopher Lowry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Turbo 2.4.5 Beta and the Console is nolonger 3215
> >
> >Mark
> >
> >Thanks for the help.  I had to remove the 3270 support and add the 3215
> >support.  The 2.4.5 kernel is working with the 3215 console.
> >After a review of the 3270 documentation and doing some testing, I could
> >see not see any advantage to the 3270.   Is there a 3270 style edit
program
> >(like VM XEdit) that works with this driver ?
> >Chris

Reply via email to