Like VSE, when you IPL native, the VM interfaces are turned off and VSE
manages the resources.

If we are going to treat Linux like a real operating system, like MVS &
VSE, it should be able to perform like a real operating system. It may
not be a popular opinion, but Linux/390 is NOT a "personal" computer
operating system and should be provided the interfaces it needs to
properly exploit the environment in which it is running, which are the
interfaces for media, memory and CPU management.

I've watched threads here on how idle Linux guests chew on CPU because
Linux PC versions expect the whole system to be idle if they are idle.

I've watched threads here about paging conflicts between VM trying to
page and Linux trying to page. 

VSE internal behavior is different when it is IPL'd as a guest of VM and
when it is IPL'd native, in paging and I/O. So does MVS, Linux should
use them as a model and co operate with VM to best exploit the
environment. 

Garry E. Ward
Senior Software Specialist
Maritz Research, Automotive Research Group
419-725-4123 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Sibley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 5:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux390 + VM + Tape 3490

So what happens when Linux is running in an LPAR or native?

Regards, Jim
Linux S/390-zSeries Support, SEEL, IBM Silicon Valley Labs
t/l 543-4021, 408-463-4021, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** Grace Happens ***




                      "Ward, Garry"
                      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                      z.com>                   cc:
                      Sent by: Linux on        Subject:  Re: Linux390 +
VM + Tape 3490
                      390 Port
                      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                      IST.EDU>


                      06/13/2003 09:21
                      AM
                      Please respond to
                      Linux on 390 Port






That is what I've been thinking.

VSE/EPIC has an auto attach feature.

Basically boils down to any given guest wants a tape drive, it should
politely ask VM for it, accept whatever it is given with a thank you and
give it back nicely when done.

Guests are guests, they should co operate with the host.

Garry E. Ward
Senior Software Specialist
Maritz Research, Automotive Research Group
419-725-4123

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Duerbusch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux390 + VM + Tape 3490

Parden the interruption.  I would like to get some clairification about
just who is affected.  I've been following these posts...

When I use tape directly from Linux (Suse), I attach/detach the tape
drives.  (Of course, running under z/VM)  I don't seem to have any of
the problems being discusses.

I do recall something about z/OS and LPARs being able to dynamically use
tape drives and, perhaps, this is the kind of use that this type of
problem surfaces with.

So, does this problem affect VM types that attach/detach?

Perhaps I've been kidding my self that my Linux tape usage hasn't been
causing problems.

Perhaps Dynam/T has been correcting these problems.

Perhaps Operations been correcting these problems and not telling me
(yea....right..that will be the day).

Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting


Confidentiality Warning:  This e-mail contains information intended only
for the use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader of
this
e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
responsible
for delivering it to the intended recipient, any dissemination,
publication
or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. The sender does not
accept any responsibility for any loss, disruption or damage to your
data
or computer system that may occur while using data contained in, or
transmitted with, this e-mail.   If you have received this e-mail in
error,
please immediately notify us by return e-mail.  Thank you.

Reply via email to