i'm about 100 feet from the mainframe :-)

i was thinking it may have something to do with having to use a second
test lpar as a bridge to the lan, but with the cpu 50% busy, both lpars
will be able to get all the cpu they want.

Robin Murray
Tel: (902) 453-7300 x4177
Cell: (902) 430-0637





"Post, Mark K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/28/2004 01:32 PM
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port


        To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        cc:
        Subject:        Re: rehat successfully inistalled


It's possibly network latency, as opposed to network busy.  How far away
(network-wise) are you from the system?

In any case, this is why I prefer software that doesn't force you to use
X-based tools.  Most of my systems are _very_ remote from me, and I can't
stand the slowness.

You might consider installing VNC.  My understanding is that it isn't as
bad
as "normal X," what ever that means.


Mark Post

-----Original Message-----
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robin
Murray
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 12:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rehat successfully inistalled


is there any advice available on speeding up xwindows apps on the
mainframe?
i've tried starting gnome/nautilis to further configure my system, and
it's
pretty near impossible due to the sluggish windows. it takes 4-5 minutes
for
the basic desktop to show up. menu's take a minute to show up.

mainframe cpu is only running 50%
network card is running 1%
pc is 95% idle

i've tried a couple of shareware x-servers for my pc. same result. i can't
think where the slowdown could be. i understand that X isn't the best
thing
for running on the mainframe, but i thought it would at least be somewhat
useable to configure the system.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to