Karl F. Larsen wrote: > For God's sake guys, Linux/unix has so much permission software > now on every file and directory why do you need more? Because there are cases that the standard Unix permission mechanism can't deal with. E.g. you can't specify one set of users that can read a file and another set that can write to it. Also, there aren't permissions for operations such as chown, chmod and rm. With ACLs, you can specify much more fine grained control over access to files. -- Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- VMS style ACLs? Edward Roper
- Re: VMS style ACLs? doc
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Trevor Johnson
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Karl F. Larsen
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Glynn Clements
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Marin D
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Pete Ryland
- Re: [svlug] VMS style ACLs? Hans Reiser
- Re: VMS style ACLs? YES! in "EXT3" in 2.3 ... R. Brock Lynn
- crypt() Command Joseph Durbin
- Re: crypt() Command ZioBudda
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Glen Fernandes
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Harold Sinclair