Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Glynn Clements wrote: > > >fixed a bug in an XEmacs package caused by using nreverse on a list > > NO Glynn, XEmacs is a sacrilege ;-). Emacs without the X is the right > editor ;*)). > > Andrea[s] Arcangeli Isn't there an "emacs-nox", a no X version of emacs which runs under X?? /J.H. -- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Local mailserver , remote Stamp out oppression!!
- For "speed freaks" MCENANEY WILLIAM J
- Re: For "speed freaks" Ted Maciag
- Re: For "speed freaks" Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: For "speed freaks&qu... MCENANEY WILLIAM J
- Re: Pointers (again) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Pointers (again) James
- Re: Pointers (again) Glynn Clements
- Re: Pointers (again) James
- Re: Pointers (again) holotko
- Re: Pointers (again) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Pointers (again) holotko
- Re: Pointers (again) MCENANEY WILLIAM J
- Re: Pointers (again) Glynn Clements
- Re: Pointers (again) Kevin Sivits
- Re: Pointers (again) holotko
- Re: Pointers (again) James
- Re: Pointers (again) [offtopic] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Pointers (again) [offtopic] James
- [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Glynn Clements
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Moshe Zadka
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Herry Budiutama