On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, CyberPeasant wrote:
> James wrote:
> > listy = (line *) malloc (sizeof (line));
>
> No need to cast the return of malloc.
Seems like casting the malloc return type is good style to me. It has
helped me catch errors to stupid mistakes like:
char *pointer;
pointer=(int *)malloc(sizeof(int));
This is also required in C++ and makes moving old code to C++ eaiser IMHO.
Just my two cents on the issued.
....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`:::' Kevin Sivits ....... ......
::: * `::. ::' one world
::: .:: .:.::. .:: .:: `::. :' one people
::: :: :: :: :: :: :::. one goverment
::: .::. .:: ::. `::::. .:' ::. one OS
..:::.....................::' .::::.
- Re: For "speed freaks&qu... MCENANEY WILLIAM J
- Re: Pointers (again) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Pointers (again) James
- Re: Pointers (again) Glynn Clements
- Re: Pointers (again) James
- Re: Pointers (again) holotko
- Re: Pointers (again) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Pointers (again) holotko
- Re: Pointers (again) MCENANEY WILLIAM J
- Re: Pointers (again) Glynn Clements
- Re: Pointers (again) Kevin Sivits
- Re: Pointers (again) holotko
- Re: Pointers (again) James
- Re: Pointers (again) [offtopic] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Pointers (again) [offtopic] James
- [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Glynn Clements
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Moshe Zadka
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Herry Budiutama
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Kevin Sivits
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi MCENANEY WILLIAM J
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Glynn Clements
