> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 00:08:53 +0200 (CEST) > From: Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Linux C Programming List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Pointers (again) > Reply-to: Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Glynn Clements wrote: > > >fixed a bug in an XEmacs package caused by using nreverse on a list > > NO Glynn, XEmacs is a sacrilege ;-). Emacs without the X is the right > editor ;*)). i like VI, it's quick, small and has no distracting menus (ok so you have to press about 10 buttons to quit it, but that's half the fun)
- Re: Pointers (again) James
- Re: Pointers (again) Glynn Clements
- Re: Pointers (again) James
- Re: Pointers (again) holotko
- Re: Pointers (again) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Pointers (again) holotko
- Re: Pointers (again) MCENANEY WILLIAM J
- Re: Pointers (again) Glynn Clements
- Re: Pointers (again) Kevin Sivits
- Re: Pointers (again) holotko
- Re: Pointers (again) [offtopic] James
- Re: Pointers (again) [offtopic] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Pointers (again) [offtopic] James
- [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Glynn Clements
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Moshe Zadka
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Herry Budiutama
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Kevin Sivits
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi MCENANEY WILLIAM J
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Glynn Clements
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi James
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Andrea Arcangeli