Hello, thanks for your replies,
Andreas Mock wrote: >> If the PDUs becomes unavailable and shortly after the host is unavailable as >> well, then assume the host is down and fenced successfully. > > 'assume' is the bad word here. Stonith is there so that the cluster does NOT > have > to assume anything, but be SURE that there is a predictible state of the > cluster. You are saying that it is okay that a single failure can bring the cluster in a unsolvable situation? I thought "SPoF" would be the bad word. Because that's what it is. > IMHO you answered your question for yourself. ;-) I don't think so, the powerfail algorithm is of course a bit more complicated. Regards, Peter _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
