Hi Andrew, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > I'd have to agree here. > However, I can imagine a (non-default) option for the agent called > cause-probable-data-corruption that let the agent behave in the way > Peter describes. > > Just so that there is no way the user can claim they didn't understand > the implications :)
You probably guessed it but I'm talking about this: http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/failsafe/FailSafe/cluster_services/cmd/crs/crsd_misc.c?annotate=1.1 (read from line 139) yes it's 8 years old, but the problem it tries to solve remains and i think there is no alternative. Regards, Peter _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
