Hi Andrew, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Peter Kruse <[email protected]> wrote: >> You are saying that it is okay that a single failure can bring the cluster >> in a unsolvable situation? I thought "SPoF" would be the bad word. >> Because that's what it is. > > Its a very bad word, but the SPoF is very clearly the hardware here. > > I understand that there are many reasons to want these integrated > power switches to work in a clustered environment, but they don't. > We all know they don't, but we come up with complex algorithms so that > we can pretend that they do.
great, I thought they were the recommended stonith devices? Are they not? Obviously not, so please do not mention them in the documentation (coming back to the topic ...). Or if you put it in the documentation then also say that it's not recommended because they do not work. Peter _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
