On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 04:31:17PM +0200, Jonathan NAYLOR wrote: > > How about GTK ? That would be GPL at least. > > But thats another language isn't it ? > > I have no desire to rewrite it, although I could be persuaded to convert it to Java > as an intellectual exercise. > > Jonathan GTK is a C/C++ toolkit, not a language. Perhaps we should wait until code is available (a few weeks) before we worry about porting efforts? What will the status of QT 2.0 be in a few weeks? I don't know either, that's my point. I'd like to see some code and play with it before I start forming opinions. Matt
- Re: sattrack Jonathan NAYLOR
- Re: sattrack Hamish Moffatt
- Re: sattrack Tomi Manninen
- Re: sattrack Hamish Moffatt
- Re: sattrack Richard Saue
- Re: sattrack Pertti Karppinen (OH6KTR)
- Re: sattrack Thomas Sailer
- Re: sattrack Joerg Reuter DL1BKE
- Re: sattrack Jonathan NAYLOR
- Re: sattrack Alex Holden
- Re: sattrack Matthew Nuckolls
- Re: sattrack John Melton - Sun UK - ENS
- Re: sattrack Jonathan NAYLOR
- Re: sattrack Thomas Sailer
- Re: sattrack Jonathan NAYLOR
- Re: sattrack Jonathan NAYLOR
- Re: sattrack Klaus Kudielka
- Re: sattrack Jonathan NAYLOR
- Re: sattrack Bruce O. Benson
- Re: sattrack Jonathan NAYLOR
- Re: sattrack Riley Williams
