On 4/4/99 2:09 AM Tim Salo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> If they >> threw out the IP protocol and started over, then all the routers on the >> internet would need to be upgraded, wouldn't they? >> [...] > >Yes. It's called IPv6. So if something as big as the Internet can >[claim to] change... > IPv6 is an extension of the present IP, they didn't even scrap the old one. And they still need to upgrade the routers ;-) >The success of the Internet demonstrates that well-documented protocol >specifications can result in a multitude of interoperating implementations. >(Never mind that nearly all host implementations are derived from >BSD...) > Preaching to the choir... Steve K4HG
- Re: APRS for Linux? Steve Dimse
- Re: APRS for Linux? Jeff King
- Re: APRS for Linux? Steve Dimse
- Re: APRS for Linux? Steve Dimse
- Re: APRS for Linux? John Rauch
- Re: APRS for Linux? Mike Bilow
- Re: APRS for Linux? Steve Dimse K4HG
- Re: APRS for Linux? Tim Salo
- Re: APRS for Linux? Karl F. Larsen
- Re: APRS for Linux? Jeff King
- IPv6 (was:APRS for Linux?) Steve Dimse K4HG
- IPv6 (was:APRS for Linux?) Michele A Debandi
- Re: APRS for Linux? Steve Dimse
- Re: APRS for Linux? James S. Kaplan
- Re: APRS for Linux? Steve Dimse
- Re: APRS for Linux? Jeff King
- APRS for Linux? Mike Bilow
- Re: APRS for Linux? Alan Crosswell
- Re: APRS for Linux? Steve Dimse K4HG
- Re: APRS for Linux? Steve Dimse K4HG
- Re: APRS for Linux? Jeff King
